Press release: GENDRO Raises Alarm Over Rollback of Diversity and Equity Initiatives in U.S. Research

Press release: GENDRO Raises Alarm Over Rollback of Diversity and Equity Initiatives in U.S. Research

27 January 2025 | GENDRO and 22 civil society and academic partners

GENEVA, SWITZERLAND (27 January 2025) The recent decisions by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to eliminate resources promoting diversity in clinical trials1, and the removal of information on NOH website about the NIH Sexual & Gender Minority Research Office (SGMRO)2, which coordinates sexual and gender minority (SGM)-related research, represent significant setbacks in addressing gender and other biases in medical research. These actions threaten to undermine decades of progress aimed at ensuring medical studies and health research accurately reflect the diverse populations they are intended to serve. Diverse representation in clinical trials is not merely a matter of equity; it is essential for scientific validity. The exclusion or underrepresentation of certain groups can lead to findings that are not generalisable, potentially compromising patient care and outcomes. Without efforts to address gender and other biases in health research, health disparities will deepen, and social inequities will persist.

Women’s underrepresentation in clinical trials and inadequate attention to sex and gender dimensions in clinical studies have already been shown to cause risks to women’s health. For instance, a 2001 report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that eight out of ten prescription drugs withdrawn from the U.S. market since 1997 posed greater health risks for women than for men.3 In addition, in 2013, the FDA issued a safety notice recognising sex differences in the metabolism of the drug zolpidem and lowered the recommended dose for women to mitigate next-morning impairment risks.4 These examples showcase how neglecting sex and gender aspects can undermine the generalisability of medical research and underscore the importance of considering sex and gender factors in drug trials before drug approvals.

Likewise, the risk of removal of initiatives such as the SGMRO further marginalises populations already underrepresented in research, leaving their unique health needs at risk of being neglected. This action deepens the disparities faced by people of diverse sexual orientation and gender identities and expression and sex characteristics, further excluding them from the evidence base that informs diagnostics, treatments, and policies, and ultimately limiting advancements in equitable healthcare.

We call upon the European Medicines Agency and other regulatory and research bodies worldwide to intensify their commitment to ensuring that medical and health research reflects the diversity of the populations it serves. It is imperative that considerations of sex and gender, and their intersections with other variables, are integrated into study designs, data collection and analysis, and reporting, as recommended by the SAGER guidelines5. Such diligence can ensure that medical interventions are safe and effective across all segments of the population, improving  diagnostic accuracy, treatment efficacy, and effectiveness of policy interventions. 

GENDRO remains steadfast in its dedication to promoting gender equity and diversity in scientific research. We will continue to advocate for policies and practices that uphold the principles of gender equality, diversity, and inclusivity, recognising that such an approach is fundamental to scientific rigour and integrity, and to advancing health equity, leaving no one behind. 

References

1.FDA purges clinical trial diversity pages | STAT. https://www.statnews.com/2025/01/23/fda-purges-pages-clinical-trial-diversity-after-trump-dei-ban/ (accessed Jan 26, 2025).

2. https://dpcpsi.nih.gov/sgmro (accessed Jan 26, 2025) 404 Error page.

3. Drug Safety: Most Drugs Withdrawn in Recent Years Had Greater Health Risks for Women. GAO-01-286R Drugs Withdrawn From Market. United States General Accounting Office, 2001.

4. U.S. Food and Drug administration. Risk of next‐morning impairment after use of insomnia drugs; FDA requires lower recommended doses for certain drugs containing zolpidem (Ambien, Ambien CR, Edluar, and Zolpimist). FDA, 2013.

5. Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Research Integrity and Peer Review 2016; 1: 2.

About GENDRO

GENDRO is a non-for-profit, non-governmental, independent association registered as a charity in Geneva, Switzerland with the mission to advance equity through the integration of sex and gender dimensions in research across disciplines. Our vision is to work collaboratively with partners, identify gaps, strengthen capacity, generate evidence, and advocate for academic research and any forms of knowledge production to create more equitable solutions to the societal challenges of our time. To learn more about GENDRO please visit our website.

Contact

For questions relating to this press release, please contact: [email protected]

Beyond COVID-19, the case for collecting, analysing and using sex-disaggregated data and gendered data to inform outbreak response: a scoping review

Beyond COVID-19, the case for collecting, analysing and using sex-disaggregated data and gendered data to inform outbreak response: a scoping review

McKinzie Gales, Emelie Love Yonally Phillips, Leah Zilversmit Pao, Christine Dubray, Clara Rodriguez Ribas Elizalde, Shirin Heidari, Marie-Amelie Degail, Marie Meudec, M Ruby Siddiqui, Simone E Carter.

BMJ Global Health – January 19, 2025

Understanding sex and gender differences during outbreaks is critical to delivering an effective response. Although recommendations and minimum requirements exist, the incorporation of sex-disaggregated data and gender analysis into outbreak analytics and response for informed decision-making remains infrequent. A scoping review was conducted to provide an overview of the extent of sex-disaggregated data and gender analysis in outbreak response within low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Continue reading

Intersectionality and diversity, equity, and inclusion in the healthcare and scientific workforces

Intersectionality and diversity, equity, and inclusion in the healthcare and scientific workforces

Trenell J Mosley, Rachel A. Zajdel, Ethel Alderete, Janine A. Clayton, Shirin Heidari, Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable, Karen Salt, Marie A. Bernard

The Lancet – January 13, 2025

Enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the scientific and healthcare workforces∗ promotes research innovation and equitable access to quality healthcare. Efforts to advance DEI within the global scientific and healthcare workforces have assumed a new urgency given the strain caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the aging of the global population, and the persistent shortages in the healthcare workforce, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Yet, these fields continue to struggle to promote DEI. Considering the impact of intersectionality—how multiple identities interact to create unique experiences of privilege and power—within these workforces will enhance efforts to promote DEI. This series explores the impact of intersectionality on scientific and healthcare workforce DEI and how prominent institutional and structural factors (e.g., sexism and racism), as well as their interpersonal manifestations, can create barriers for workers with multiple intersecting marginalised identities. This paper, the first in a three-part series, describes how intersecting identities interact with workplace inequities and suggests ways to incorporate intersectionality into DEI efforts within the scientific and healthcare workforces.

Continue reading

GEH Network: a conversation with Sophie Harman

4 February 2025 | GENDRO


This timely discussion promises to offer fresh insights and opportunities for learning, connecting, and building momentum for collective feminist action. Whether you’ve read the book or are curious to learn more, this is a unique chance to engage with thought-provoking ideas and connect with a vibrant community.


Improving sex and gender equity in research protocols: the new SAGER-swissethics recommendations

Improving sex and gender equity in research protocols: the new SAGER-swissethics recommendations

Gayet-Ageron A, Clair C, Schwarz J, Heidari S, Bovet E, Bize R, Stute P, Nadal D, Magnin A, Kalberer N, Michaud P-A. 

Swiss Medical Weekly – December 9, 2024

Research ethics committees play a critical role in ensuring compliance with Swiss law on research involving human subjects, which prohibits discrimination and mandates the fair inclusion of participants. Recent amendments to Swiss regulations emphasise the importance of including diverse groups representative of the target population in terms of sex and age, with any exclusions requiring clear justification. Globally, representativeness and diversity in research remain challenges, despite guidelines like the SAGER guidelines, which aim to embed sex and gender considerations into research design and reporting. In response, swissethics established a working group in 2023 to develop the “SAGER-swissethics recommendations,” promoting the integration of these dimensions in Swiss health research. This paper highlights the ethical and scientific importance of addressing sex and gender in research.

Continue reading